Top latest Five case laws for the bail of section 506 ppc Urban news
Top latest Five case laws for the bail of section 506 ppc Urban news
Blog Article
However, the above mentioned observation is without prejudice into the legal rights on the parties, arising out with the over marriage from the pair, if any, pending before the competent court of regulation. Read more
Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by law." It is actually effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is usually a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents from the boy or Female will not approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they're able to do if they are able to Slice off social relations with the son or the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the few is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to activity by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by regulation.
Sign up for E-mail Notification of new opinions The cases listed down below have had opinions filed for them within the final 14 times. The following information is readily available for Each and every case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, which include signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. Additionally they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi models, with non-compliance struggling with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They are really directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement in the laws, the legal system adheres towards the doctrine of stare decisis
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice of the Peace u/s 22-A will not be obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing to your accused party; nor obliged to essentially or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to look at all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a few of the relevant factors. Read more
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the law when it can be unclear how it relates to any supplied situation, typically rendering judgments based within the intent of lawmakers as well as the circumstances in the case at hand. This kind of decisions become a guide for upcoming similar cases.
On June 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf in the boy by a guardian advertisement litem, against DCFS, the social worker, as well as the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf of the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advert litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for the dismissal based on absolute immunity, as they were all acting in their Work opportunities with DCFS.
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may perhaps interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mold the relief to really make it ideal to your facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified from the decision in the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. If the appeal just isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she will then method the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, given that the ninety times for the department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we've read more been guided with the decision in the Supreme Court inside the case of Dr.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar dilemma. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in applying the regulation. This example of case regulation refers to two cases heard in the state court, on the same level.
As the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been reached, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) from the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory law, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory legislation, which are established by executive companies based on statutes.